Free 100 pokies no deposit sign up bonus, and the second deposit it depends on
A "free 100 pokies" sign up offer reads like a gift and usually behaves like a hook. This page assumes you have not yet deposited, that the 100 figure refers to 100 free spins (or 100 free credits) rather than 100 dollars of real cash, and that any winnings you generate sit behind conditions until you make a follow-on payment. The second deposit is where most of the real terms live, so it gets most of the attention here.
This page is a paid placement. Operators and affiliate partners pay for the listings and links you see, and that payment influences which offers appear and in what order. It does not change the arithmetic, the warnings, or the legal position set out below. How This Site Is Paid
- welcome package 100% up to 4000 aud + 1200 fs + bonus game
- first deposit bonus 100% up to 1000 aud + bonus game + 300 fs
- second deposit bonus 100% up to 1000 aud + 300 fs
- qvx-pay-bitcoin-1
- qvx-pay-visa-1
- qvx-pay-tether-1
- qvx-pay-ethereum-1
- welcome package 600% up to $4800 + 255 free spins
- daily cashback 10%
- weekly rakeback bonus! the genie grants your wishes!
- qvx-pay-ethereum-1
- qvx-pay-payid-1
- qvx-pay-skrill-1
- qvx-pay-bitcoin-1
- qvx-pay-paysafecard-1
- CRYPTO WELCOME BONUS 140% UP TO 1,600 USDT +140 FS
- CASINO WELCOME PACK 570% Up To $11,400 + 270 FS
- VIP WELCOME PACK 850% UP TO $27,000
- starting bonus package up to 5200 au$ + instant bonus round + 1500 free spins
- first deposit bonus 100% up to au$300 + instant bonus round + 100 free spins
- highroller bonus 100% up to au$3,000
- qvx-pay-bitcoin-1
- qvx-pay-mastercard-1
- qvx-pay-paysafecard-1
- qvx-pay-neteller-1
- first deposit bonus 120% up to 5000 aud + instant bonus round + 250 fs
- second deposit bonus 100% up to 2500 aud + 250 fs
- third deposit bonus 80% up to 2500aud + 250 fs
- qvx-pay-payid-1
- qvx-pay-ethereum-1
- qvx-pay-bitcoin-1
- qvx-pay-neteller-1
- qvx-pay-skrill-1
Advertising. The order of these entries is paid for, the wording inside each one was written by whoever supplies the offer and arrives here unaltered, and no figure in any entry has been checked against a source cited on this site. How the arrangement works is set out at How this site is paid.
What "free 100 pokies" actually describes
The phrase "free 100 pokies no deposit sign up bonus" is marketing language, not a defined product. In practice it describes one of four things, and the four behave very differently. The first is 100 free spins on a named pokie, credited at a stated value per spin, usually between 10 cents and 50 cents. The second is 100 free credits or bonus dollars, which is a playable balance rather than a spin count. The third is 100 spins split across several days, with a portion released only after a qualifying deposit. The fourth is a headline number that refers to a maximum win cap rather than to the spins themselves. When you read an offer, the first job is to work out which of the four you are looking at, because the difference between 100 spins at 10 cents and 100 credits at one dollar is a factor of ten in exposure, and the difference between either of those and a conditional allocation is the difference between a bonus and an advertisement.
None of these offers is cash. A no deposit sign up bonus is a promotional credit. It arrives with a wagering requirement attached, which means you must stake the bonus or the resulting winnings a set number of times before any of it converts into withdrawable money. A typical requirement sits between 30 and 60 times the bonus amount, though the range in published terms is wider than that. If you receive 100 free spins at 20 cents, and all 100 spins produce a return at the pokie's published return to player, the expected gross win is small. If the spins produce nothing, which is the most likely single outcome on a low spin value, the bonus has cost you nothing but time. If the spins produce a large hit, the wagering requirement and the maximum win cap decide what happens next.
There is also a definitional problem with the word "pokies". In Australia, "pokies" refers to gaming machines regulated under state and territory gaming machine legislation, and those machines are physical devices in licensed venues. The games you find inside an online casino are digital replications or original titles from software providers. They are not pokies in the statutory sense, and an operator that markets them as free pokies is using familiar language to describe something that sits outside the venue based framework entirely. That matters for two reasons. First, a digital game's return to player and volatility are published by the provider and can be checked, whereas a venue machine's behaviour is governed by a different approvals regime. Second, the legal position for the digital product is set by Commonwealth law, not by the state gaming machine rules that licence physical pokies. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) is the statute that matters here, and its definitions are load bearing.
So the honest answer to "what is a free 100 pokies bonus" is that it is a small promotional allocation attached to a registration, with conditions on both the front end and the back end. The front end is the sign up itself. The back end is the wagering, the win cap, the game weighting, the expiry, and the deposit dependency. The second deposit dependency is the part most often left for the terms and conditions, and it is the part that converts a no deposit offer into a conditional one.
The second deposit ladder and why it exists
Most no deposit sign up bonuses are the first rung of a ladder rather than a standalone gift. The ladder is a sequence of matched deposit offers, and the no deposit bonus exists to get you onto the first rung so that the later rungs can be presented to you. A common published structure looks like this: a no deposit allocation on registration, a first deposit match, a second deposit match, sometimes a third and fourth, frequently with free spins attached to some of them. The no deposit rung is deliberately small. Its job is not to pay you. Its job is to produce a registration, a verified identity, and a first session of play, which are the three things that make a deposit conversion possible.
The second deposit is where the terms concentrate for a simple commercial reason. The first deposit is often treated generously because it is the conversion event that proves intent. The second deposit is where an operator can afford to attach tighter conditions, because by then the player has an account, has played, and has some familiarity with the platform. That is where you tend to find the free spins worth more, the match percentages worth more, and the wagering requirements that govern the whole ladder written in their most restrictive form. It is also where the release condition for earlier winnings sometimes sits. A terms page might say that winnings from the no deposit welcome allocation are held as bonus credit until a qualifying deposit is made, and that only then does the wagering clock begin.
The dependency can take several published forms, and they are not equivalent. The mildest form is a bonus balance that cannot be withdrawn until a deposit is made, while the wagering requirement runs from the moment the bonus is credited. A harsher form is a bonus balance that cannot be wagered at all until a deposit is made, which means the free allocation sits frozen and expires unused if you never pay. A harsher form still is a withdrawal condition that voids the no deposit winnings if a qualifying deposit is not made within a set period, sometimes as short as seven days. The harshest published version combines all three: the winnings are held, the wagering cannot start, and the whole allocation lapses on a deadline that is shorter than the time it takes many people to decide whether they want an account at all.
There is a further layer that players often miss. A "second deposit" dependency is sometimes not about the second deposit at all but about the deposit that follows the no deposit allocation. If the welcome sequence is no deposit then first deposit, the phrase "second deposit" in a promotional email may mean the second payment you make, which is the first matched deposit. If the sequence is no deposit, first deposit, second deposit, then "second deposit" means the third transaction in the sequence. Operators are not always consistent about this, and the only reliable source is the terms page plus the bonus history page inside your account. Before you treat any headline as describing a specific step in a ladder, find the clause that names the triggering payment and read it twice. If the clause uses "qualifying deposit" without a number, assume the earliest payment counts and that anything you have already made may disqualify you from the sign up allocation.
The free spins that need a payment to become cashable
The "free" 100 pokies that require a second payment to become cashable are the central puzzle of this topic, and the arithmetic is less mysterious than the language. Take a representative published offer: 100 free spins at 20 cents each on a nominated pokie, credited on registration, with any winnings placed in a bonus balance. The wagering requirement is 40 times the bonus, the maximum conversion is capped at 100 dollars, the spins expire in seven days, and the bonus balance is not withdrawable and does not begin wagering until a qualifying deposit of at least 20 dollars is made. Now run the numbers. One hundred spins at 20 cents is 20 dollars of stake. At a 96 per cent return to player, the expected return across those spins is 19 dollars and 20 cents, but the distribution around that expected value is wide. Most sessions return less than the stake and many return nothing at all. A minority of sessions return a multiple, and those returns are what the offer is advertising to you.
Suppose the spins return 30 dollars in winnings. That 30 dollars goes into the bonus balance. The wagering requirement at 40 times is 1,200 dollars of stake before anything converts. At a 96 per cent return, the expected cost of turning over 1,200 dollars is 48 dollars. The expected conversion value is therefore negative before the cap is applied, and the cap of 100 dollars only matters in the small number of sessions where the spins return enough to make the 1,200 dollar turnover achievable. This is the arithmetic that makes a small no deposit bonus a marketing instrument rather than a payout mechanism. It is not a trick in the sense of being hidden. The requirement is published. It is simply that the published requirement, once you multiply it out, tells you that the expected value to the player is negative and the expected value to the operator is positive, which is the normal structure of any gambling product.
Now add the deposit dependency. The spins are credited free, but the winnings do not start wagering until you deposit. If you never deposit, the bonus balance sits there and expires. If you deposit, you have converted a no deposit offer into a funded account, and the wagering now runs against a balance that includes your own money mixed with bonus credit. The order in which your real money and the bonus are consumed matters enormously and is usually set out in a clause about "sticky" versus "non sticky" bonuses. In a sticky structure, the bonus stays in the account and your real money is staked first, which means the wagering requirement can consume your deposit before it touches the bonus. In a non sticky structure, the bonus is removed when you withdraw or when wagering completes, and only the winnings convert. The difference between these two structures on the same headline offer can be the difference between losing your deposit and keeping it. Read that clause before you deposit, not after.
There is a narrower reading of the phrase that deserves attention. Some offers describe the free allocation as 100 free pokies but mean 100 free spins that are only awarded after the second deposit, with the sign up itself producing nothing but an account. In that structure the words "no deposit" are doing no work at all, because the allocation is a deposit bonus with a delayed trigger. The headline is technically a sign up bonus in the sense that it is tied to registration, but the value is conditional on payment. When you see a page that describes a no deposit offer and then, three paragraphs down, refers to a "qualifying deposit to activate", you are looking at the conditional structure regardless of what the headline says. The test is simple and mechanical. Ask what you receive, and what you can do with it, if you never pay a cent. If the answer is nothing, or a balance that expires unused, the offer is not no deposit in any useful sense.
Running the wagering arithmetic yourself
You can do the arithmetic for any offer in about three minutes with a calculator, and doing it is the single most useful habit this page can give you. The method has five inputs. First, the credited value: 100 spins at a stated per spin value, or a stated bonus amount. Second, the wagering multiplier, expressed as a number of times the bonus. Third, the game weighting, which is the percentage of each stake that counts toward the requirement on the game you are playing. Fourth, the maximum conversion cap, which is the most you can withdraw from the bonus. Fifth, the expiry, which sets how much time you have to complete the turnover. Multiply the credited value by the multiplier to get the required turnover. Divide by the game weighting to get the actual stake you must place if you are playing an excluded or reduced weighting game. Compare the result to the expiry at your normal stake size. If the required stake divided by your stake per spin exceeds the number of spins you can realistically play before expiry, the offer is not completable on your habits and its headline value is irrelevant to you.
Worked example. A bonus of 20 dollars, a multiplier of 40 times, full weighting on the nominated pokie, a cap of 100 dollars, and seven days. Required turnover is 800 dollars. At 20 cents per spin that is 4,000 spins. At 60 spins per minute, which is a brisk but plausible rate on an autoplay setting, that is about 67 minutes of continuous play. That is achievable for a determined player. Now change one input: reduce the game weighting to 20 per cent, which is common for table games and sometimes for certain pokies. The required stake becomes 4,000 dollars, which is 20,000 spins at 20 cents, which is over five hours of continuous play and not realistically achievable in seven days for most people. Change another input: hold the bonus as frozen until a deposit, and the clock may not start until you pay, which either helps you, because the clock is not yet running, or hurts you, because the allocation can lapse before you decide. The arithmetic does not tell you whether to take the offer. It tells you what the offer actually asks of you, which the headline does not.
The number that headline offers never quite give you is the expected cost of completion. If the pokie returns 96 per cent, then every 100 dollars of stake has an expected cost of 4 dollars to the player. Multiply that by the required turnover and you have the expected cost of clearing the bonus. On an 800 dollar turnover at 96 per cent, the expected cost is 32 dollars, which is more than the 20 dollar bonus. On a 4,000 dollar turnover, the expected cost is 160 dollars, which is eight times the bonus. This is why small no deposit bonuses almost never produce a positive expected outcome, and why the operators can afford to give them away. The expected cost is not a certainty. Variance means some players clear the requirement and withdraw, and those players are the ones the marketing quotes. But the expected cost is the number that describes the offer as a whole, and it is the number you should compare against the headline.
Two further inputs change the calculation and are frequently buried. The first is the treatment of the deposit itself. If the bonus is sticky and your real money is staked first, the expected cost of turnover applies to your deposit as well as to the bonus, and the cap limits the upside. If the bonus is non sticky, the deposit is returned to you when wagering completes, and only the winnings convert, which is a materially better structure. The second is the maximum bet rule. Most published terms cap the stake per spin or per hand while a bonus is active, often at 5 dollars or less, and breaching the cap can void the bonus and the winnings. That cap interacts with the turnover calculation: a lower maximum bet means more spins to clear the same turnover, which means more time against the expiry. Read the cap, read the weighting, read the stickiness, and then run the five inputs. The result will usually tell you whether the offer is worth an hour of your evening, and it will always tell you more than the headline.
Why a second deposit dependency is not no deposit in practice
The term "no deposit" has a plain meaning: you receive something without paying. An offer that credits 100 spins but withholds the winnings until you deposit, or freezes the wagering until you deposit, or voids the allocation if you do not deposit within a deadline, does not satisfy that plain meaning. It satisfies a narrower and more technical meaning, which is that the credit is advanced before payment rather than after. That is a real distinction for the operator, because it describes the order of events in the account ledger. It is not a meaningful distinction for you, because the value of the credit is zero until you pay. When an offer is described as no deposit and the terms disclose a payment dependency, the honest description is "credit advanced, value conditional". The headline and the terms are describing different products.
This is not a fringe reading. It is the ordinary way consumer facing bonus terms work in jurisdictions where the product is legal. The dependency is disclosed, usually in a clause that says something like "winnings from the welcome free spins are held as bonus funds and become eligible for withdrawal only after a qualifying deposit and completion of the wagering requirement". The clause is doing exactly what it says. The problem is the distance between that clause and the headline, which is usually a banner that says "100 free spins no deposit". A reader who takes the banner at face value has formed a belief that the terms contradict. The remedy is not to distrust everything, which is unhelpful, but to make the terms page the first thing you read rather than the last. Search the page for the words "qualifying deposit", "wagering", "maximum conversion", "expiry", and "maximum bet". Those five searches will tell you what the offer is.
There is a second practical reason the dependency matters, which is that it changes the loss profile. On a genuine no deposit offer, your maximum loss is zero, because you have not paid anything. On a conditional offer, your maximum loss is your deposit plus the time you spent, and the expected loss is the expected cost of turnover on the deposit and the bonus together. The difference between a zero maximum loss and a deposit maximum loss is the difference between a free sample and a funded gambling session. The conditional offer is not dishonest if the terms are clear, but it is a different product, and it should be evaluated as one. If you would not deposit 20 dollars to play a pokie for an hour with an 800 dollar turnover requirement, then the no deposit headline has not changed that fact. The headline is not a reason to deposit. The terms are the reason, or they are the reason not to.
A practical test settles the question. Open the offer page and the terms page side by side. Find the clause that governs the withdrawal of winnings from the sign up allocation. If that clause requires any payment, any verification step that you cannot complete without payment, or any action that only becomes available after a deposit, then the offer is conditional and should be described as conditional. Write down the amount of the qualifying deposit and the deadline. Then ask yourself whether you would have made that deposit anyway, on the merits of the platform, without the free allocation. If the answer is yes, the allocation is a small extra and the dependency is not doing any harm. If the answer is no, then the allocation is the reason for the deposit, which is exactly the commercial purpose of the ladder, and you should be clear with yourself about which decision you are making.
The prohibition background in Australia
The legal position in Australia is not ambiguous, and it should be stated plainly before any discussion of offer mechanics. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) prohibits interactive gambling services provided to people in Australia. The definition in s5(1) covers a service that is provided in the course of carrying on a business and that is an interactive gambling service, and the exclusions in s5(3) carve out certain categories, including services covered by the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) and services covered by a state or territory licence in the circumstances the section describes. The practical effect is that an online casino offering pokie style games to Australian residents is a prohibited interactive gambling service unless a specific exclusion applies, and the exclusions do not generally reach casino style products. No Australian licence exists for the kind of online casino that advertises a free 100 pokies bonus. An operator offering that product to people in Australia is offering it from outside the Australian licensing framework.
The enforcement architecture has three parts that matter to a player. The first is the Australian Communications and Media Authority, which administers the Act and can investigate prohibited services and move to have them blocked. The second is the civil penalty regime, which is expressed in penalty units. From 1 July 2026 a penalty unit is $364. Civil penalties in the Act are set as multiples of penalty units, and the multiples are substantial, which is why the penalty unit figure is quoted in coverage of enforcement actions. The third is BetStop, the national self exclusion register, which is administered by the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre. BetStop lets a person exclude themselves from all licensed Australian online wagering providers for a minimum period, and it is available on 1800 238 786. BetStop does not cover unlicensed offshore operators, because those operators are not registered with it, which is one of the practical reasons the register cannot protect a player who chooses an unlicensed site.
The consequence for the offer in the headline is straightforward. A "free 100 pokies no deposit sign up bonus" offered to an Australian resident is, in the ordinary case, an offer from a service that is prohibited under Commonwealth law and unlicensed in Australia. That does not mean the offer is imaginary or that the website does not exist. It means the operator is outside the Australian regulatory perimeter, which has three practical effects. There is no Australian regulator to complain to about a disputed bonus term. There is no statutory dispute resolution process that binds the operator. And the operator's own terms, which are usually governed by the law of a foreign jurisdiction, are the only contractual framework you have. Those terms will typically include clauses on account closure, confiscation of winnings where terms are breached, identity verification, and the operator's right to amend the bonus terms. Read them as contracts, because that is what they are.
None of this is a reason to treat the arithmetic in the previous sections as academic. The arithmetic applies to any bonus, licensed or not. But the legal position changes the risk weighting. When a bonus dispute arises with a licensed Australian wagering provider, there is a regulator, there is an external dispute resolution scheme, and there is a statutory framework. When a bonus dispute arises with an unlicensed operator, your remedies are the operator's internal complaints process and, if the terms provide for it, arbitration in a foreign jurisdiction. The practical value of a 20 dollar bonus, weighed against the possibility of a dispute you cannot practically pursue, is not high. That is the real reason to be cautious about headline offers, more than any single term in the small print.
What operators publish, and what they leave out
Operators publish more than players often assume, and the published material is where the useful information sits. A typical terms page for a no deposit sign up allocation will state the number of spins, the per spin value, the eligible games, the wagering multiplier, the game weighting table, the maximum conversion, the expiry period, the maximum bet while the bonus is active, and the qualifying deposit rule. All of that is there. What is left out is context. The page rarely states the expected cost of turnover, the probability that a player clears the requirement, or the distribution of outcomes across the spins. Those omissions are not unique to gambling. They are the normal omissions of promotional material. The remedy is arithmetic, and the previous sections have set out how to do it.
There are, however, specific omission patterns worth naming. The first is the split allocation, where 100 spins are described as a single award but are actually released in tranches, for example 20 spins per day for five days. The tranche structure interacts with expiry and with the deposit dependency, and it can make completion impossible if the release schedule is longer than the expiry on each tranche. The second is the mixed game weighting, where the headline names a high weighting pokie but the small print excludes it from contributing to the sign up allocation, leaving only low weighting games eligible. The third is the deposit match that is described as part of a package, where the no deposit allocation is bundled with a first and second deposit match in a way that makes it hard to see which terms govern which award. The fourth is the "winnings held" clause discussed above, which converts a no deposit award into a conditional one. The fifth is the verification requirement, which sometimes requires identity documents before any withdrawal and which can interact with a withdrawal deadline in a way that disadvantages a player who registers casually.
The way to read an operator's published material is to treat the terms page as the primary document and the banner as an advertisement for it. Start with the bonus terms index, find the current version, and note the date it was last updated. Bonus terms change, and a version from three months ago may not govern your account. Then find the definitions section, because terms like "bonus funds", "real money", "wagering requirement", and "qualifying deposit" are usually defined there and the definitions control the operative clauses. Then read the withdrawal section, the maximum bet section, and the account closure section, in that order. Those three sections determine what happens when you try to take money out, which is the point at which most disputes arise. The offer mechanics in the headline are the least legally consequential part of the document.
Finally, keep your own record. Screenshot the terms page on the day you register, note the bonus amount and the expiry in your own file, and save any email that confirms the allocation. If a dispute arises, the operator's system will have a record of the terms that applied at the time, and your record is your evidence of what you were shown. This is a small habit that costs three minutes and is worth more than most of the advice on offer comparison pages. It also has a side benefit. Reading the terms closely enough to screenshot them is reading them closely enough to notice the qualifying deposit clause, which is the clause this entire page is about. If the second deposit dependency is the thing that decides whether the free 100 pokies are worth your time, then the screenshot habit is the mechanism by which you find it before you deposit rather than after.
One closing note on the second deposit specifically. If you have read the terms and decided the conditional offer is acceptable to you, treat the second deposit dependency as a deliberate budget line rather than an incidental step. Name the amount, name the deadline, and decide in advance what you will do if the wagering is not complete by the deadline. The structure of the ladder is designed to make the next rung feel like the natural continuation of the last one. It is not a continuation. It is a separate financial decision each time. The arithmetic in this page is the tool for making each of those decisions on its own merits, and the legal position in this page is the context that tells you who you are dealing with when you make them. If gambling is causing harm, or if you are worried about your own play, BetStop on 1800 238 786 is the national self exclusion register, and it is a faster route to a decision than any bonus term is.
Questions about 100 free pokies
- Is a free 100 pokies no deposit sign up bonus really free if I have to make a second deposit?
- No, not in any practical sense. If the terms say the winnings are held until a qualifying deposit is made, or that the wagering cannot start until you pay, then the allocation has no cash value to you unless you deposit. The credit is advanced before payment, which is the technical meaning of no deposit in the operator's ledger, but the value is conditional on payment. Read the clause that governs withdrawal of the sign up winnings and treat that clause as the true description of the offer.
- How do I calculate whether a 100 spin bonus is worth taking?
- Multiply the credited value by the wagering multiplier to get the required turnover. Divide by the game weighting if you are playing a reduced weighting game. Compare the required stake to the number of spins you can realistically play before the expiry at your normal stake size. Then estimate the expected cost of that turnover at the game's published return to player, which is roughly the turnover multiplied by the house edge. If the expected cost exceeds the bonus and the maximum conversion cap, the offer's headline value is not achievable for you in expectation.
- What does it mean when an operator says winnings from free spins are held as bonus funds?
- It means the winnings are not withdrawable money. They sit in a bonus balance, subject to wagering, and they typically convert only when the wagering requirement is met and any deposit dependency is satisfied. It also means the winnings are usually subject to a maximum conversion cap, so a large win on the spins does not necessarily become a large withdrawal. The held balance may expire, and the expiry clock may start at a different point from the wagering clock.
- Are these online pokies legal in Australia?
- An online casino offering pokie style games to people in Australia is, in the ordinary case, a prohibited interactive gambling service under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth). The definitions in s5(1) and the exclusions in s5(3) do not generally reach casino style products, and no Australian licence exists for that product. The operator is therefore outside the Australian regulatory perimeter, which means there is no Australian regulator to resolve a bonus dispute and no statutory dispute resolution process that binds the operator.
- What is a penalty unit and why is $364 mentioned?
- A penalty unit is the statutory unit used to express civil and criminal penalties in Commonwealth legislation. From 1 July 2026 the value is $364, and it is indexed. Provisions in the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) that create civil penalties are written as multiples of penalty units, so the dollar figure appears in coverage of enforcement. It is a measuring stick in the legislation, not a fee attached to any bonus or a charge you would personally face for signing up.
- How does game weighting change the second deposit requirement?
- Game weighting is the percentage of each stake that counts toward the wagering requirement on the game you are playing. Full weighting on a nominated pokie might be 100 per cent, while other games may contribute 20 per cent or be excluded entirely. At 20 per cent weighting, a 1,000 dollar requirement becomes 5,000 dollars of actual stake, which is five times the playtime. The weighting table sits in the terms, and it is the input most often overlooked when players compare two offers with identical multipliers.
- Where can I get help if gambling is becoming a problem?
- BetStop is the national self exclusion register, administered by the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre, and it is reachable on 1800 238 786. It lets you exclude yourself from all licensed Australian online wagering providers for a minimum period. BetStop does not cover unlicensed offshore operators, which is one reason the legal position matters. If you are considering a conditional bonus as a reason to deposit, a conversation with a gambling support service before the deposit is a better use of the next hour than the bonus is.